Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering Return Requirements

The purpose of a dissertation is to declare one's innovation or creativity. The thesis should be written not to complete the task, meet the target, but beyond the predecessor, the theme must be innovative. The subject of the paper should not be the process of “research”, “design”, “realization”, “analysis”, etc., but rather the It should be the innovative point that it produces. The academic level of the dissertation is reflected in the abstraction of laws that can cover a wider scope without specific products and processes. It is not necessary to cover the whole task, product or system, and it is not necessary to be confidential. Be sure to pick your innovation point before you start writing.

The thesis cannot be classified.

1. the title of the chapter. Accurate, concise technical composition (rather than application, performance attributes) key words logical combination of the expression of the name of the innovation point. To not be renamed with any paper, avoid generic. Avoid wearing a big hat (small content, big title). Avoid using non-public foreign languages and abbreviated letters. No more than 20 characters, no sensitive words such as “a certain type” and “so-and-so”. The title of the paper should be a noun expression of innovative software (including methods and findings) or hardware, not a verb expression of “research”, “analysis” and other processes.

2. Organization and authors.

3. Abstract. It is a concise abbreviation of the introduction and conclusion of the paper without notes and comments. So that the reader does not read the whole text that is able to understand the essence of the paper, can not be written as a paper structure (ideas) introduction. Abstract only four sentences: ① purpose (for ......, proposed ......); ② methodology (summary of innovation); ③ verification results; ④ summary (conclusion, discussion). The abstract is located at the top, but should be extracted and organized (not rewritten) at the end, ① from the introduction, ② ③ ④ from the conclusion. Abstract is an independent short article, shall not appear “this paper”.

4. Keywords. Keywords are the Chinese subject words that express the category to which the paper belongs and the properties of application and performance. Listed through the fuzzy search to find the article's 3 to 8 keywords, generally from the abstract. Keyword arrangement is best according to the range, first large and then small. The key words should not be out of the ordinary, preferably from the “Chinese Theme Word List”.

5. Chinese Figure Classification Number: the author must fill in, multi-disciplinary can fill in more, but the best is TJ (weapons industry technology) in the front.

6. Introduction. Positioning the paper to address the current academic high point of the position of the remaining shortcomings, equivalent to the “problem”, “reasons for publication”, about whether the novelty can be recognized. Four elements of the introduction: (1) scope, research direction; (2) recent development, citing references to the direction of domestic and international academic high points of the recent evolution of the course; (3) academic gaps, to find the previous unresolved issues is the core of the introduction, as the purpose of the research into the abstract; (4) point out the title, pointing out to solve the above shortcomings and “put forward ... ...(name of innovation point)”, a sentence to the point. The introduction does not write the conclusion, do not have to write the thesis structure (ideas) introduction.

7. Chapter 1, the foundation. Including references (transformation object), drawing on the object (the “based on” technology), equivalent to the patent specification of the “background technology”, is the thesis of the material library. This chapter is “known”, completely cited, does not involve their own work. All formulas and concepts found in the references should appear in this chapter. However, only the principles and results are written, not the derivations, so as not to overshadow the main point. Foundation laying helps in understanding the innovation and avoids mixing up the known with the innovation and intellectual property being questioned. Do not try to characterize the innovation as a castle in the air without a foundation; it is neither objective nor wise.

8. Chapter 2, Themes. Innovation is often described as a method or device, but methods and devices inevitably contain mature building blocks. The key to this chapter is to point out the specific location of the innovation in the new method or device, and to pinpoint the innovation to the “point”. The concise articulation of the point of innovation and its distinctiveness is critical to the recognition of inventiveness. Stating the point of innovation is equivalent to the “content of the invention” in a patent specification, and clarifies what is to be declared in principle. The distinctive features are equivalent to the “claims” of the patent specification, which are compared with the reference materials to draw a clear line and strip out the “points” of innovation. However, that is all. There is no need to write about the process of innovation. Methods are generally embodied by the steps of how to do it first and how to do it later, but do not need to be described in detail or complex flow charts, preferably a block diagram-level introduction to the principle. If divided into sections, it is best to write the relationship of the sections, to the innovation, before section 1. This chapter is titled with the name of the innovation, completely write their own innovation, do not directly cite references (can be indirectly quoted in the first chapter of the formula code).

9. Chapter 3, verification. Untested “innovation” is not convincing. The verification of the innovation is related to the practicality of whether to be recognized, is the focus of the thesis, the length is not small. Prove that the innovation solves the problem posed in the introduction, is better than the previous one (faster, more accurate, more sensitive, more reliable, etc.), but also faithfully reflect the limitations. Practice is the only criterion to test the truth, if there is no practical application or experiment, at least there should be simulation (computer experiment) or theoretical support that has been tested by practice. Multiple validations are better and can be described in separate sections. All conclusions should have a factual basis in this chapter.

10. Conclusion. Generally labeled as Chapter 4, is summarized from Chapter 2, 3 focus. Conclusion of the four elements: ① title (should not be replaced by “the”); ② summary of the innovation (the method ......); ③ validation results (there should be a “test shows that” and so on, the beginning of the sentence); ④ Application and direction of further research. Not very sure when you can use “Discussion” instead of “Conclusion”, but do not use “Concluding Remarks”, “Summary” and other titles. The title should not be “Conclusion” or “Summary”. Strengths should not be included in the summary of innovations, but in the validation results. Conclusion and introduction to complement the main points of the paper, but each of them has its own responsibilities, do not cross the line, do not write the results of the introduction, the conclusion is not written “for”.

11. references. For the argument to provide a theoretical starting point, comparative references, verification data, while echoing the introduction, reflecting the author to track the technical development of the vision and acumen, reflecting the author is qualified to say that they are innovative. Number of articles 15 or more (25 or more for review articles). Internal publication literature cannot be used. Literature should not be obsolete; Chinese and foreign literature from the last 5 years is appropriate.